WW2 The Bad War – Dr David Duke and Mike King

Advertisements

11 comments

  1. ᛋᛉᚺ|ᛟᚾ · March 3

    The worst war which serves as example of the propaganda-making process and it’s affect on the populous at large, the worst war in terms of atrocities, one’s which are swept under the rug.

    There are no more real wars for true causes of liberation just Jew Wars to protect their investments, although to be fair there is resisting these parasites but that war cannot be waged by conventional means lest the damage reflected back upon our kinsmen be tenfold.

    Liked by 1 person

    • vikinglifeblog · March 3

      Good point. I would ad, that semi “civil war” might be the only way to make the immigrants go home (of cause that could count as a one more jew war). And the immigrant will very likely start such war themselves.

      I doubt that the world learned its lesson from WWII and looking at the west, I can see that we certainly didn’t learn enough.

      I posted the video Königsberg yesterday and it fits perfectly to the topic in the video, especially when they talked about the land Polackistan stole from Germany.
      After WWII Polackistan and Russiastan stole Danzig, Königsberg and East Prussia.
      The video in honor of Königsberg and East Prussia are made and posted, Danzig will come later!

      Liked by 1 person

      • ᛋᛉᚺ|ᛟᚾ · March 3

        Capitulated territories, some would argue against such a favor to re-unite national lands under the pretense that all lands are mutually European. While that might technically be true it’s too loose for many, and does not change the fact that these are German heritage sites.

        Liked by 2 people

    • vikinglifeblog · March 3

      LARPing alert!

      I would like Germany to get their land back, but I would rather see Europe been divided in 2, 3, 4 or even 5 parts.
      2. East-West
      3. East-West-South
      4. East-West-South-UK
      5. East-West-South-UK-Scandinavia (or Nordic Region)
      Stop calling Eastern Europe a part of Europe and call it Asia instead.
      Africa could even get South Europe, since they like african so much.

      Liked by 1 person

      • ᛋᛉᚺ|ᛟᚾ · March 3

        Yes I agree with you for the most part regarding keeping their distinction separate, to be honest it’s already called Eurasia for a good reason because that is exactly what it is! Neither Europe nor Asia, however notice a certain former black-metaller does not use the term and even considers the separation distasteful. On another note Slavic peoples already have more land than all of Continental Europe combined so I do not see why they should immigrate in the millions into Europe this is another part Varg never addresses because well we’re all share the same core ancestor. This isn’t the last ice-age too much has changed over the past 40,000+ years for that comparison to work considering 21st century dynamics.

        Liked by 1 person

    • vikinglifeblog · March 3

      Good point. Slavic people have more land than North-West Europe and North America together.
      People should be truthful, ethical and morally the same, no matter what topic.
      Varg is very biased and dishonest regarding slavic people and would be a lot more tasteful, if he kept his mouth shut about them. Instead he is trying to manipulate his followers, to believe his fairy tales.
      Arab and african invasion is wrong/bad, eastern european invasion is perfectly fine/no problem.

      Liked by 1 person

      • ᛋᛉᚺ|ᛟᚾ · March 3

        Their mindset is also very much antagonistic to every quality that is Germanic I’ve noticed, typically sluggish and dull in contrast. Very much not the same at all.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. larryzb · March 3

    World War II, as some have said, was a war that made much of the globe safe for communism. Japan was the only impediment to Mao’s communists in China. But, back to your focus, Europe. Yes, it was the worst war and it left much of Europe in ruins. Yes, undeniable atrocities were committed by the Allies, but the victors get to write the history, sorry to say. Churchill was a freaking war monger. But, from a military history viewpoint, Hitler’s blunders cost Germany the war.

    Consider: what if Hitler does not give the halt order in late May, 1940? What if Guderian and the panzers are allowed to continue on to and beyond Moscow instead of turning south to Kiev in August, 1941? What if Hitler had been more realistic and had German war material production working 24/7 starting in 1940? The list goes on and on. The irony is that without Hitler Germany probably does not go to war, but with him they could not win such a war. Either way, I know the German people got screwed after World War I and then they were to be destroyed after the Second World War.

    What a gob-smacked world we live in.

    Liked by 1 person

    • vikinglifeblog · March 3

      You are absolutely right. History would look very differently on the Allied war crimes and Churchill as a person, if Germany had won.
      Corporal Hitler was no Field Marshal, and I am sure he made some major blunders.
      Some of them might be, because Germany had a great need for oil and very little oil production themselves.
      If Hitler had parkinson’s disease, it would have explained why he was in such a hurry.
      As I remember Germany’s industry production reached its peak in 1944, which is amazing considering the lack of staff, lack of resources and the Allied “strategic” bombing. There can be no doubt that it would have made a big difference, if they did that in 1939-1940. The same goes for putting their Wunder Waffe in production, when they had the chance (and not after they needed them).

      “Either way, I know the German people got screwed after World War I and then they were to be destroyed after the Second World War.”

      I think, that goes for all of us.

      Liked by 1 person

      • larryzb · March 3

        Hitler, according to some sources, was being given many different drugs from 1937 onwards. If true, that would help to explain his judgment being impaired.

        Oh, and if Hitler does not declare war on the US in Dec, 1941, Franklin Roosevelt would have managed to bring about an incident to get the US into the European war, probably by the summer of 1942. By then, if all had been done correctly, Germany might have been unbeatable. The Germans could have built a massive air force to defend Germany from the Brits and the Americans, and to be used, if there was no peace treaty, to take the war on a much larger scale to Britain. If the USSR was knocked out, and Germany in control of the continent, the Brits and Americans might have had to accept that the cost of invading Europe was too high and had too slim a chance of success.

        Liked by 1 person

    • vikinglifeblog · March 4

      “Hitler, according to some sources, was being given many different drugs from 1937 onwards. If true, that would help to explain his judgment being impaired.”

      Yes, that too. The stress, pressure and attempts to assassinate him, could also play a big part.

      The timing was generally not in his favor. I think, that you are right, because USA was not that eager to lose their young men. Both UK and USA looked like they wanted Germany (+satellite states) and Soviet Union to fight it out, and then intervene when its most favorable.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s