About National Socialism, Pan-European Nationalism, Waffen SS and Hitler Worshiping

First off, I don’t have anything against any real White Nationalists, National Socialists, Alt-Righter or Hitler Worshipper. I do dislike the many LARPing coward-faggots in their ranks, who want to rewrite history and sacrifice North and West Europe to gain millions of shitty allies in the East.

Eastern Europe for Eastern European people. Without being a burden on us.

Germanic countries for Germanic people.

I think, that it is fair to conclude that Hitler and his followers at the time wanted “Germanic countries for Germanic people”.

Be a National Socialist or not, but stop corrupting Hitler’s legacy.

S-ithole Information

A Hierarchy of White Nationalism

For a Different Age I Was Born

Question 4 Pan-European nationalists

There is no return from demographic genocide!

European Tier System

Hitler and the East

Generalplan Ost

An Invasive Duo

About Germany’s Non-White Troops

The black boy who grew up in NS Germany

Adolf Hitler on the Importance of Racial Preservation

“What history taught us about the policy followed by the House of Habsburg was corroborated by our own everyday experiences. In the north and in the south the poison of foreign races was eating into the body of our people, and even Vienna was steadily becoming more and more a non-German city. The ‘Imperial House’ favoured the Czechs on every possible occasion. Indeed it was the hand of the goddess of eternal justice and inexorable retribution that caused the most deadly enemy of Germanism in Austria, the Archduke Franz Ferdinand, to fall by the very bullets which he himself had helped to cast. Working from above downwards, he was the chief patron of the movement to make Austria a Slav State.”

Page 18 in Mein Kampf

Does it sound like Hitler wanted Germany and Germanic countries invaded by non-Germanic people?

“What I knew of Social Democracy in my youth was precious little and that little was for the most part wrong. The fact that it led the struggle for universal suffrage and the secret ballot gave me an inner satisfaction; for my reason then told me that this would weaken the Habsburg regime, which I so thoroughly detested. I was convinced that even if it should sacrifice the German element the Danubian State could not continue to exist. Even at the price of a long and slow Slaviz-ation of the Austrian Germans the State would secure no guarantee of a really durable Empire; because it was very questionable if and how far the Slavs possessed the necessary capacity for constructive politics. Therefore I welcomed every movement that might lead towards the final disruption of that impossible State which had decreed that it would stamp out the German character in ten millions of people. The more this babel of tongues wrought discord and disruption, even in the Parliament, the nearer the hour approached for the dissolution of this Babylonian Empire. That would mean the liberation of my German Austrian people, and only then would it become possible for them to be re-united to the Motherland.

Accordingly I had no feelings of antipathy towards the actual policy of the Social Democrats. That its avowed purpose was to raise the level of the working classes-which in my ignorance I then foolishly believed–was a further reason why I should speak in favour of Social Democracy rather than against it. But the features that contributed most to estrange me from the Social Democratic movement was its hostile attitude towards the struggle for the conservation of Germanism in Austria, its lamentable cocotting with the Slav ‘comrades’, who received these approaches favourably as long as any practical advantages were forthcoming but otherwise maintained a haughty reserve, thus giving the importunate mendicants the sort of answer their behaviour deserved.”

Page 38 in Mein Kampf

“More than any other State, the existence of the old Austria depended on a strong and capable Government. The Habsburg Empire lacked ethnical uniformity, which constitutes the fundamental basis of a national State and will preserve the existence of such a State even though the ruling power should be grossly inefficient. When a State is composed of a homogeneous population, the natural inertia of such a population will hold the Stage together and maintain its existence through astonishingly long periods of misgovernment and maladministration. It may often seem as if the principle of life had died out in such a body-politic; but a time comes when the apparent corpse rises up and displays before the world an astonishing manifestation of its indestructible vitality.

But the situation is utterly different in a country where the population is not homogeneous, where there is no bond of common blood but only that of one ruling hand. Should the ruling hand show signs of weakness in such a State the result will not
be to cause a kind of hibernation of the State but rather to awaken the individualist instincts which are slumbering in the ethnological groups. These instincts do not make themselves felt as long as these groups are dominated by a strong central will-togovern. The danger which exists in these slumbering separatist instincts can be rendered more or less innocuous only through centuries of common education, common traditions and common interests. The younger such States are, the more their existence will depend on the ability and strength of the central government. If their foundation was due only to the work of a strong personality or a leader who is a man of genius, in many cases they will break up as soon as the founder disappears; because, though great, he stood alone. But even after centuries of a common education and experiences these separatist instincts I have spoken of are not always completely overcome. They may be only dormant and may suddenly awaken when the central government shows weakness and the force of a common education as well as the prestige of a common tradition prove unable to withstand the vital energies of separatist nationalities forging ahead towards the shaping of their own individual existence.”

Page 66 in Mein Kampf

“The intellectual level of the debate was quite low. Some times the debaters did not make themselves intelligible at all. Several of those present did not speak German but only their Slav vernaculars or dialects. Thus I had the opportunity of hearing with my own ears what I had been hitherto acquainted with only through reading the newspapers. A turbulent mass of people, all gesticulating and bawling against one another, with a pathetic old man shaking his bell and making frantic efforts to call the House to a sense of its dignity by friendly appeals, exhortations, and grave warnings.”

Page 70 in Mein Kampf

“The parliamentary regime became one of the causes why the strength of the Habsburg State steadily declined during the last years of its existence. The more the predominance of the German element was whittled away through parliamentary procedure, the more prominent became the system of playing off one of the various constituent nationalities against the other. In the Imperial Parliament it was always the German element that suffered through the system, which meant that the results were detrimental to the Empire as a whole; for at the close of the century even the most simple-minded people could recognize that the cohesive forces within the Dual Monarchy no longer sufficed to counterbalance the separatist tendencies of the provincial nationalities. On the contrary!

The measures which the State adopted for its own maintenance became more and more mean spirited and in a like degree the general disrespect for the State increased. Not only Hungary but also the various Slav provinces gradually ceased to identify themselves with the monarchy which embraced them all, and accordingly they did not feel its weakness as in any way detrimental to themselves. They rather welcomed those manifestations of senile decay. They looked forward to the final dissolution of the State, and not to its recovery.

The complete collapse was still forestalled in Parliament by the humiliating concessions that were made to every kind of importunate demands, at the cost of the German element. Throughout the country the defence of the State rested on playing off the various nationalities against one another. But the general trend of this development was directed against the Germans. Especially since the right of succession to the throne conferred certain influence on the Archduke Franz Ferdinand, the policy of increasing the power of the Czechs was carried out systematically from the upper grades of the administration down to the lower. With all the means at his command the heir to the Dual Monarchy personally furthered the policy that aimed at eliminating the influence of the German element, or at least he acted as protector of that policy. By the use of State officials as tools, purely German districts were gradually but decisively brought within the danger zone of the mixed languages. Even in Lower Austria this process began to make headway with a constantly increasing tempo and Vienna was looked upon by the Czechs as their biggest city.

In the family circle of this new Habsburger the Czech language was favoured. The wife of the Archduke had formerly been a Czech Countess and was wedded to the Prince by a morganatic marriage. She came from an environment where hostility to the Germans had been traditional. The leading idea in the mind of the Archduke was to establish a Slav State in Central Europe, which was to be constructed on a purely Catholic basis, so as to serve as a bulwark against Orthodox Russia.

As had happened often in Habsburg history, religion was thus exploited to serve a purely political policy, and in this case a fatal policy, at least as far as German interests were concerned. The result was lamentable in many respects.”

Page 83 in Mein Kampf

“After the great war of 1870-71 the House of Habsburg set to work with all its determination to exterminate the dangerous German element–about whose inner feelings and attitude there could be no doubt–slowly but deliberately. I use the word exterminate, because that alone expresses what must have been the final result of the Slavophile policy. Then it was that the fire of rebellion blazed up among the people whose extermination had been decreed. That fire was such as had never been witnessed in modern German history.

For the first time nationalists and patriots were transformed into rebels.

Not rebels against the nation or the State as such but rebels against that form of government which they were convinced, would inevitably bring about the ruin of their own people. For the first time in modern history the traditional dynastic patriotism and national love of fatherland and people were in open conflict.

It was to the merit of the Pan-German movement in Austria during the closing decade of the last century that it pointed out clearly and unequivocally that a State is entitled to demand respect and protection for its authority only when such authority is administered in accordance with the interests of the nation, or at least not in a manner detrimental to those interests.

The authority of the State can never be an end in itself; for, if that were so, any kind of tyranny would be inviolable and sacred.

If a government uses the instruments of power in its hands for the purpose of leading a people to ruin, then rebellion is not only the right but also the duty of every individual citizen.

The question of whether and when such a situation exists cannot be answered by theoretical dissertations but only by the exercise of force, and it is success that decides the issue.

Every government, even though it may be the worst possible and even though it may have betrayed the nation’s trust in thousands of ways, will claim that its duty is to uphold the authority of the State. Its adversaries, who are fighting for national selfpreservation, must use the same weapons which the government uses if they are to
prevail against such a rule and secure their own freedom and independence. Therefore the conflict will be fought out with ‘legal’ means as long as the power which is to be overthrown uses them; but the insurgents will not hesitate to apply illegal means if the oppressor himself employs them.

Generally speaking, we must not forget that the highest aim of human existence is not the maintenance of a State of Government but rather the conservation of the race.

If the race is in danger of being oppressed or even exterminated the question of legality is only of secondary importance. The established power may in such a case employ only those means which are recognized as ‘legal’. yet the instinct of self-preservation on the part of the oppressed will always justify, to the highest degree, the employment of all possible resources.

Only on the recognition of this principle was it possible for those struggles to be carried through, of which history furnishes magnificent examples in abundance, against foreign bondage or oppression at home.

Human rights are above the rights of the State. But if a people be defeated in the struggle for its human rights this means that its weight has proved too light in the scale of Destiny to have the luck of being able to endure in this terrestrial world.

The world is not there to be possessed by the faint-hearted races. Austria affords a very clear and striking example of how easy it is for tyranny to hide its head under the cloak of what is called ‘legality’.

The legal exercise of power in the Habsburg State was then based on the anti-German attitude of the parliament, with its non-German majorities, and on the dynastic House, which was also hostile to the German element. The whole authority of the State was incorporated in these two factors. To attempt to alter the lot of the German element through these two factors would have been senseless. Those who advised the ‘legal’ way as the only possible way, and also obedience to the State authority, could offer no resistance; because a policy of resistance could not have been put into effect through legal measures. To follow the advice of the legalist counsellors would have meant the inevitable ruin of the German element within the Monarchy, and this disaster would not have taken long to come. The German element has actually been saved only because the State as such collapsed.

The spectacled theorist would have given his life for his doctrine rather than for his people.

Because man has made laws he subsequently comes to think that he exists for the sake of the laws.

A great service rendered by the pan-German movement then was that it abolished all such nonsense, though the doctrinaire theorists and other fetish worshippers were shocked.

When the Habsburgs attempted to come to close quarters with the German element, by the employment of all the means of attack which they had at their command, the PanGerman Party hit out ruthlessly against the ‘illustrious’ dynasty. This Party was the first to probe into and expose the corrupt condition of the State; and in doing so they opened the eyes of hundreds of thousands. To have liberated the high ideal of love for one’s country from the embrace of this deplorable dynasty was one of the great services rendered by the Pan-German movement.

When that Party first made its appearance it secured a large following–indeed, the movement threatened to become almost an avalanche. But the first successes were not maintained. At the time I came to Vienna the pan-German Party had been eclipsed by the Christian-Socialist Party, which had come into power in the meantime. Indeed, the Pan-German Party had sunk to a level of almost complete insignificance.

The rise and decline of the Pan-German movement on the one hand and the marvellous progress of the Christian-Socialist Party on the other, became a classic object of study for me, and as such they played an important part in the development of my own views.

When I came to Vienna all my sympathies were exclusively with the Pan-German Movement.

I was just as much impressed by the fact that they had the courage to shout HEIL HOHENZOLLERN as I rejoiced at their determination to consider themselves an integral part of the German Empire, from which they were separated only provisionally. They never missed an opportunity to explain their attitude in public, which raised my enthusiasm and confidence. To avow one’s principles publicly on every problem that concerned Germanism, and never to make any compromises, seemed to me the only way of saving our people. What I could not understand was how this movement broke down so soon after such a magnificent start; and it was no less incomprehensible that the Christian-Socialists should gain such tremendous power within such a short time. They had just reached the pinnacle of their popularity.

When I began to compare those two movements Fate placed before me the best means of understanding the causes of this puzzling problem. The action of Fate in this case was hastened by my own straitened circumstances.”

Page 87 in Mein Kampf

Here is Hitler not only speaking against an Eastern European “invasion”, but also use words as “selfpreservation”, “human rights” and “conservation of the race”.

“If a government uses the instruments of power in its hands for the purpose of leading a people to ruin, then rebellion is not only the right but also the duty of every individual citizen.”

“The reasons why the new Party engaged in a violent campaign against Rome were as follows:

As soon as the House of Habsburg had definitely decided to transform Austria into a Slav State all sorts of means were adopted which seemed in any way serviceable for that purpose. The Habsburg rulers had no scruples of conscience about exploiting even religious institutions in the service of this new ‘State Idea’. One of the many methods thus employed was the use of Czech parishes and their clergy as instruments for spreading Slav hegemony throughout Austria. This proceeding was carried out as follows:

Parish priests of Czech nationality were appointed in purely German districts. Gradually but steadily pushing forward the interests of the Czech people before those of the Church, the parishes and their priests became generative cells in the process of de-Germanization.

Unfortunately the German-Austrian clergy completely failed to counter this procedure. Not only were they incapable of taking a similar initiative on the German side, but they
showed themselves unable to meet the Czech offensive with adequate resistance. The German element was accordingly pushed backwards, slowly but steadily, through the perversion of religious belief for political ends on the one side, and the Jack of proper resistance on the other side. Such were the tactics used in dealing with the smaller problems; but those used in dealing with the larger problems were not very different.

The anti-German aims pursued by the Habsburgs, especially through the instrumentality of the higher clergy, did not meet with any vigorous resistance, while the clerical representatives of the German interests withdrew completely to the rear. The general impression created could not be other than that the Catholic clergy as such were grossly neglecting the rights of the German population.

Therefore it looked as if the Catholic Church was not in sympathy with the German people but that it unjustly supported their adversaries. The root of the whole evil, especially according to Schönerer’s opinion, lay in the fact that the leadership of the Catholic Church was not in Germany, and that this fact alone was sufficient reason for the hostile attitude of the Church towards the demands of our people.

The so-called cultural problem receded almost completely into the background, as was generally the case everywhere throughout Austria at that time. In assuming a hostile attitude towards the Catholic Church, the Pan-German leaders were influenced not so much by the Church’s position in questions of science but principally by the fact that the Church did not defend German rights, as it should have done, but always supported those who encroached on these rights, especially then Slavs.

George Schönerer was not a man who did things by halves. He went into battle against the Church because he was convinced that this was the only way in which the German people could be saved. The LOS-VON-ROM (Away from Rome) Movement seemed the most formidable, but at the same time most difficult, method of attacking and destroying the adversary’s citadel. Schönerer believed that if this movement could be carried through successfully the unfortunate division between the two great religious denominations in Germany would be wiped out and that the inner forces of the German Empire and Nation would be enormously enhanced by such a victory.

But the premises as well as the conclusions in this case were both erroneous.

It was undoubtedly true that the national powers of resistance, in everything concerning Germanism as such, were much weaker among the German Catholic clergy than among their non-German confrères, especially the Czechs. And only an ignorant person could be unaware of the fact that it scarcely ever entered the mind of the German clergy to take the offensive on behalf of German interests.

But at the same time everybody who is not blind to facts must admit that all this should be attributed to a characteristic under which we Germans have all been doomed to suffer. This characteristic shows itself in our objective way of regarding our own nationality, as if it were something that lay outside of us.

While the Czech priest adopted a subjective attitude towards his own people and only an objective attitude towards the Church, the German parish priest showed a subjective devotion to his Church and remained objective in regard to his nation. It is a phenomenon which, unfortunately for us, can be observed occurring in exactly the same way in thousands of other cases.

It is by no means a peculiar inheritance from Catholicism; but it is something in us which does not take long to gnaw the vitals of almost every institution, especially institutions of State and those which have ideal aims. Take, for example, the attitude of our State officials in regard to the efforts made for bringing about a national resurgence and compare that attitude with the stand which the public officials of any other nation would have taken in such a case. Or is it to be believed that the military officers of any other country in the world would refuse to come forward on behalf of the national aspirations, but would rather hide behind the phrase ‘Authority of the State’, as has been the case in our country during the last five years and has even been deemed a meritorious attitude? Or let us take another example. In regard to the Jewish problem, do not the two Christian denominations take up a standpoint to-day which does not respond to the national exigencies or even the interests of religion? Consider the attitude of a Jewish Rabbi towards any question, even one of quite insignificant importance, concerning the Jews as a race, and compare his attitude with that of the majority of our clergy, whether Catholic or Protestant.”

Page 98 in Mein Kampf

“During my sojourn in Vienna I had ample leisure and opportunity to study this problem without allowing any prejudices to intervene; and in my daily intercourse with people I was able to establish the correctness of the opinion I formed by the test of thousands of instances.

In this focus where the greatest varieties of nationality had converged it was quite clear and open to everybody to see that the German pacifist was always and exclusively the one who tried to consider the interests of his own nation objectively; but you could never find a Jew who took a similar attitude towards his own race. Furthermore, I found that only the German Socialist is ‘international’ in the sense that he feels himself obliged not to demand justice for his own people in any other manner than by whining and wailing to his international comrades. Nobody could ever reproach Czechs or Poles or other nations with such conduct. In short, even at that time, already I recognized that this evil is only partly a result of the doctrines taught by Socialism, Pacifism, etc., but mainly the result of our totally inadequate system of education, the defects of which are responsible for the lack of devotion to our own national ideals.

Therefore the first theoretical argument advanced by the Pan-German leaders as the basis of their offensive against Catholicism was quite entenable.”

Page 100 in Mein Kampf

“A feeling of discontent grew upon me and made me depressed the more I came to realize the inside hollowness of this State and the impossibility of saving it from collapse. At the same time I felt perfectly certain that it would bring all kinds of misfortune to the German people.

I was convinced that the Habsburg State would balk and hinder every German who might show signs of real greatness, while at the same time it would aid and abet every non-German activity.

This conglomerate spectacle of heterogeneous races which the capital of the Dual Monarchy presented, this motley of Czechs, Poles, Hungarians, Ruthenians, Serbs and Croats, etc., and always that bacillus which is the solvent of human society, the Jew, here and there and everywhere–the whole spectacle was repugnant to me. The gigantic city seemed to be the incarnation of mongrel depravity.”

Page 109 in Mein Kampf

“In Austria only the Habsburgs and the German-Austrians supported the alliance. The Habsburgs did so from shrewd calculation of their own interests and from necessity. The Germans did it out of good faith and political ignorance. They acted in good faith inasmuch as they believed that by establishing the Triple Alliance they were doing a great service to the German Empire and were thus helping to strengthen it and consolidate its defence. They showed their political ignorance, however, in holding such ideas, because, instead of helping the German Empire they really chained it to a moribund State which might bring its associate into the grave with itself; and, above all, by championing this alliance they fell more and more a prey to the Habsburg policy of de-Germanization. For the alliance gave the Habsburgs good grounds for believing that the German Empire would not interfere in their domestic affairs and thus they were in a position to carry into effect, with more ease and less risk, their domestic policy of gradually eliminating the German element. Not only could the ‘objectiveness’ of the German Government be counted upon, and thus there need be no fear of protest from that quarter, but one could always remind the German-Austrians of the alliance and thus silence them in case they should ever object to the reprehensible means that were being employed to establish a Slav hegemony in the Dual Monarchy.”

Page 114 in Mein Kampf

“Once the influence of the Germans in Austria had been wiped out, what then would be the value of the alliance? If the Triple Alliance were to be advantageous to Germany, was it not a necessary condition that the predominance of the German element in Austria should be maintained? Or did anyone really believe that Germany could continue to be the ally of a Habsburg Empire under the hegemony of the Slavs?”

Page 114 in Mein Kampf

“From the viewpoint of racial policy, this alliance with Austria was simply disastrous. A new Slavic Great Power was allowed to grow up close to the frontiers of the German Empire. Later on this Power was bound to adopt towards Germany an attitude different from that of Russia, for example. The Alliance was thus bound to become more empty and more feeble, because the only supporters of it were losing their influence and were being systematically pushed out of the more important public offices.”

Page 128 in Mein Kampf

“It was lucky for Germany that the war of 1914 broke out with Austria as its direct cause, for thus the Habsburgs were compelled to participate. Had the origin of the War been otherwise, Germany would have been left to her own resources. The Habsburg State would never have been ready or willing to take part in a war for the origin of which Germany was responsible. What was the object of so much obloquy later in the case of Italy’s decision would have taken place, only earlier, in the case of Austria. In other
words, if Germany had been forced to go to war for some reason of its own, Austria would have remained ‘neutral’ in order to safeguard the State against a revolution which might begin immediately after the war had started. The Slav element would have preferred to smash up the Dual Monarchy in 1914 rather than permit it to come to the assistance of Germany. But at that time there were only a few who understood all the dangers and aggravations which resulted from the alliance with the Danubian Monarchy.”

Page 128 in Mein Kampf

“It was possible to arouse the whole of Eastern Europe against Austria, especially Russia, and Italy also. The world coalition which had developed under the leadership of King Edward could never have become a reality if Germany’s ally, Austria, had not offered such an alluring prospect of booty. It was this fact alone which made it possible to combine so many heterogeneous States with divergent interests into one common phalanx of attack. Every member could hope to enrich himself at the expense of Austria if he joined in the general attack against Germany. The fact that Turkey was also a tacit party to the unfortunate alliance with Austria augmented Germany’s peril to an extraordinary degree.”

Page 129 in Mein Kampf

“When the Russo-Japanese War came I was older and better able to judge for myself. For national reasons I then took the side of the Japanese in our discussions. I looked upon the defeat of the Russians as a blow to Austrian Slavism.”

Page 138 in Mein Kampf

“When the news came to Munich that the Archduke Franz Ferdinand had been murdered, I had been at home all day and did not get the particulars of how it happened. At first I feared that the shots may have been fired by some GermanAustrian students who had been aroused to a state of furious indignation by the persistent pro-Slav activities of the Heir to the Habsburg Throne and therefore wished to liberate the German population from this internal enemy. It was quite easy to imagine what the result of such a mistake would have been. It would have brought on a new wave of persecution, the motives of which would have been ‘justified’ before the whole world. But soon afterwards I heard the names of the presumed assassins and also that they were known to be Serbs. I felt somewhat dumbfounded in face of the inexorable vengeance which Destiny had wrought. The greatest friend of the Slavs had fallen a victim to the bullets of Slav patriots.”

Page 139 in Mein Kampf

“It is unjust to the Vienna government of that time to blame it now for the form and tenor of the ultimatum which was then presented. In a similar position and under similar circumstances, no other Power in the world would have acted otherwise. On her southern frontiers Austria had a relentless mortal foe who indulged in acts of provocation against the Dual Monarchy at intervals which were becoming more and more frequent. This persistent line of conduct would not have been relaxed until the arrival of the opportune moment for the destruction of the Empire. In Austria there was good reason to fear that, at the latest, this moment would come with the death of the old Emperor. Once that had taken place, it was quite possible that the Monarchy would not be able to offer any serious resistance. For some years past the State had been so
completely identified with the personality of Francis Joseph that, in the eyes of the great mass of the people, the death of this venerable personification of the Empire would be tantamount to the death of the Empire itself. Indeed it was one of the clever artifices of Slav policy to foster the impression that the Austrian State owed its very existence exclusively to the prodigies and rare talents of that monarch. This kind of flattery was particularly welcomed at the Hofburg, all the more because it had no relation whatsoever to the services actually rendered by the Emperor. No effort whatsoever was made to locate the carefully prepared sting which lay hidden in this glorifying praise. One fact which was entirely overlooked, perhaps intentionally, was that the more the Empire remained dependent on the so-called administrative talents of ‘the wisest Monarch of all times’, the more catastrophic would be the situation when Fate came to knock at the door and demand its tribute.”

Page 139 in Mein Kampf

“My own attitude towards the conflict was equally simple and clear. I believed that it was not a case of Austria fighting to get satisfaction from Serbia but rather a case of Germany fighting for her own existence–the German nation for its own to-be-or-not-tobe, for its freedom and for its future. The work of Bismarck must now be carried on. Young Germany must show itself worthy of the blood shed by our fathers on so many heroic fields of battle, from Weissenburg to Sedan and Paris. And if this struggle should bring us victory our people will again rank foremost among the great nations. Only then could the German Empire assert itself as the mighty champion of peace, without the necessity of restricting the daily bread of its children for the sake of maintaining the peace.”

Page 142 in Mein Kampf

Chapter 11

Race And People

Page 236 in Mein Kampf

“The JEWISH ECHO, however, is not an official gazette and therefore not authoritative in the eyes of those government potentates.”

Page 253 in Mein Kampf 🙂


Page 273 in Mein Kampf

“We must consider it as fortunate that a Germanization of Austria according to the plan of Joseph II did not succeed. Probably the result would have been that the Austrian
State would have been able to survive, but at the same time participation in the use of a common language would have debased the racial quality of the German element. In the course of centuries a certain herd instinct might have been developed but the herd itself would have deteriorated in quality. A national State might have arisen, but a people who had been culturally creative would have disappeared.

For the German nation it was better that this process of intermixture did not take place, although it was not renounced for any high-minded reasons but simply through the short-sighted pettiness of the Habsburgs. If it had taken place the German people could not now be looked upon as a cultural factor.

Not only in Austria, however, but also in the REICH, these so-called national circles were, and still are, under the influence of similar erroneous ideas. Unfortunately, a policy towards Poland, whereby the East was to be Germanized, was demanded by many and was based on the same false reasoning. Here again it was believed that the Polish people could be Germanized by being compelled to use the German language. The result would have been fatal. A people of foreign race would have had to use the German language to express modes of thought that were foreign to the German, thus compromising by its own inferiority the dignity and nobility of our nation.”

Page 322 in Mein Kampf

“We National Socialists, who are fighting for a new WELTANSCHAUUNG, must never take our stand on the famous ‘basis of facts’, and especially not on mistaken facts. If we did so, we should cease to be the protagonists of a new and great idea and would become slaves in the service of the fallacy which is dominant to-day. We must make a clear-cut distinction between the vessel and its contents. The State is only the vessel and the race is what it contains. The vessel can have a meaning only if it preserves and safeguards the contents. Otherwise it is worthless.

Hence the supreme purpose of the ethnical State is to guard and preserve those racial elements which, through their work in the cultural field, create that beauty and dignity which are characteristic of a higher mankind. As Aryans, we can consider the State only as the living organism of a people, an organism which does not merely maintain the existence of a people, but functions in such a way as to lead its people to a position of supreme liberty by the progressive development of the intellectual and cultural faculties.”

Page 326 in Mein Kampf

“On these principles we National Socialists base our standards of value in appraising a State. This value will be relative when viewed from the particular standpoint of the individual nation, but it will be absolute when considered from the standpoint of humanity as a whole. In other words, this means:

That the excellence of a State can never be judged by the level of its culture or the degree of importance which the outside world attaches to its power, but that its excellence must be judged by the degree to which its institutions serve the racial stock which belongs to it.”

Page 326 in Mein Kampf

“Those who do not wish that the earth should fall into such a condition must realize that it is the task of the German State in particular to see to it that the process of bastardization is brought to a stop.

Our contemporary generation of weaklings will naturally decry such a policy and whine and complain about it as an encroachment on the most sacred of human rights. But there is only one right that is sacrosanct and this right is at the same time a most sacred duty. This right and obligation are: that the purity of the racial blood should be guarded, so that the best types of human beings may be preserved and that thus we should render possible a more noble development of humanity itself.”

Page 332 in Mein Kampf

“One thing is certain: our world is facing a great revolution. The only question is whether the outcome will be propitious for the Aryan portion of mankind or whether the everlasting Jew will profit by it.

By educating the young generation along the right lines, the People’s State will have to see to it that a generation of mankind is formed which will be adequate to this supreme combat that will decide the destinies of the world.

That nation will conquer which will be the first to take this road.”

Page 351 in Mein Kampf

“THE INSTITUTION that is now erroneously called the State generally classifies people only into two groups: citizens and aliens. Citizens are all those who possess full civic rights, either by reason of their birth or by an act of naturalization. Aliens are those who enjoy the same rights in some other State. Between these two categories there are certain beings who resemble a sort of meteoric phenomena. They are people who have no citizenship in any State and consequently no civic rights anywhere.

In most cases nowadays a person acquires civic rights by being born within the frontiers of a State. The race or nationality to which he may belong plays no role whatsoever. The child of a Negro who once lived in one of the German protectorates and now takes up his residence in Germany automatically becomes a ‘German Citizen’ in the eyes of the world. In the same way the child of any Jew, Pole, African or Asian may automatically become a German Citizen.

Besides naturalization that is acquired through the fact of having been born within the confines of a State there exists another kind of naturalization which can be acquired later. This process is subject to various preliminary requirements. For example one condition is that, if possible, the applicant must not be a burglar or a common street thug. It is required of him that his political attitude is not such as to give cause for uneasiness; in other words he must be a harmless simpleton in politics. It is required that he shall not be a burden to the State of which he wishes to become a citizen. In this realistic epoch of ours this last condition naturally only means that he must not be a financial burden. If the affairs of the candidate are such that it appears likely he will turn out to be a good taxpayer, that is a very important consideration and will help him to obtain civic rights all the more rapidly.

The question of race plays no part at all.

The whole process of acquiring civic rights is not very different from that of being admitted to membership of an automobile club, for instance. A person files his application. It is examined. It is sanctioned. And one day the man receives a card which informs him that he has become a citizen. The information is given in an amusing way.
An applicant who has hitherto been a Zulu or Kaffir is told: “By these presents you are now become a German Citizen.”

The President of the State can perform this piece of magic. What God Himself could not do is achieved by some Theophrastus Paracelsus (Note 16) of a civil servant through a mere twirl of the hand. Nothing but a stroke of the pen, and a Mongolian slave is forthwith turned into a real German. Not only is no question asked regarding the race to which the new citizen belongs; even the matter of his physical health is not inquired into. His flesh may be corrupted with syphilis; but he will still be welcome in the State as it exists to-day so long as he may not become a financial burden or a political danger.

In this way, year after year, those organisms which we call States take up poisonous matter which they can hardly ever overcome.

Another point of distinction between a citizen and an alien is that the former is admitted to all public offices, that he may possibly have to do military service and that in return he is permitted to take a passive or active part at public elections. Those are his chief privileges. For in regard to personal rights and personal liberty the alien enjoys the same amount of protection as the citizen, and frequently even more. Anyhow that is how it happens in our present German Republic.

I realize fully that nobody likes to hear these things. But it would be difficult to find anything more illogical or more insane than our contemporary laws in regard to State citizenship.

At present there exists one State which manifests at least some modest attempts that show a better appreciation of how things ought to be done in this matter. It is not, however, in our model German Republic but in the U.S.A. that efforts are made to conform at least partly to the counsels of commonsense. By refusing immigrants to enter there if they are in a bad state of health, and by excluding certain races from the right to become naturalized as citizens, they have begun to introduce principles similar to those on which we wish to ground the People’s State.

The People’s State will classify its population in three groups: Citizens, subjects of the State, and aliens.”

Page 360 in Mein Kampf

“It would be absurd to appraise a man’s worth by the race to which he belongs and at the same time to make war against the Marxist principle, that all men are equal, without being determined to pursue our own principle to its ultimate consequences. If we admit the significance of blood, that is to say, if we recognize the race as the fundamental element on which all life is based, we shall have to apply to the individual the logical consequences of this principle. In general I must estimate the worth of nations differently, on the basis of the different races from which they spring, and I must also differentiate in estimating the worth of the individual within his own race. The principle, that one people is not the same as another, applies also to the individual members of a national community. No one brain, for instance, is equal to another; because the constituent elements belonging to the same blood vary in a thousand subtle details, though they are fundamentally of the same quality.”

Page 364 in Mein Kampf

“The Balkanization of Europe, up to a certain degree, was desirable and indeed necessary in the light of the traditional policy of Great Britain, just as France desired the Balkanization of Germany.

What England has always desired, and will continue to desire, is to prevent any one Continental Power in Europe from attaining a position of world importance. Therefore England wishes to maintain a definite equilibrium of forces among the European States-for this equilibrium seems a necessary condition of England’s world-hegemony.

What France has always desired, and will continue to desire, is to prevent Germany from becoming a homogeneous Power. Therefore France wants to maintain a system of small German States whose forces would balance one another and over which there should be no central government. Then, by acquiring possession of the left bank of the Rhine, she would have fulfilled the pre-requisite conditions for the establishment and security of her hegemony in Europe.”

Page 502 in Mein Kampf

Chapter 14

Germany’s Policy In Eastern Europe

Page 521 in Mein Kampf

“We National Socialists have to go still further. The right to territory may become a duty when a great nation seems destined to go under unless its territory be extended. And that is particularly true when the nation in question is not some little group of negro people but the Germanic mother of all the life which has given cultural shape to the modern world. Germany will either become a World Power or will not continue to exist at all. But in order to become a World Power it needs that territorial magnitude which gives it the necessary importance to-day and assures the existence of its citizens.

Therefore we National Socialists have purposely drawn a line through the line of conduct followed by pre-War Germany in foreign policy. We put an end to the perpetual Germanic march towards the South and West of Europe and turn our eyes towards the lands of the East. We finally put a stop to the colonial and trade policy of pre-War times and pass over to the territorial policy of the future.

But when we speak of new territory in Europe to-day we must principally think of Russia and the border States subject to her.

Destiny itself seems to wish to point out the way for us here. In delivering Russia over to Bolshevism, Fate robbed the Russian people of that intellectual class which had once created the Russian State and were the guarantee of its existence. For the Russian State was not organized by the constructive political talent of the Slav element in Russia, but was much more a marvellous exemplification of the capacity for State-building possessed by the Germanic element in a race of inferior worth. Thus were many powerful Empires created all over the earth. More often than once inferior races with Germanic organizers and rulers as their leaders became formidable States and continued to exist as long as the racial nucleus remained which had originally created each respective State. For centuries Russia owed the source of its livelihood as a State to the Germanic nucleus of its governing class. But this nucleus is now almost wholly broken up and abolished. The Jew has taken its place. Just as it is impossible for the Russian to shake off the Jewish yoke by exerting his own powers, so, too, it is impossible for the Jew to keep this formidable State in existence for any long period of time. He himself is by no means an organizing element, but rather a ferment of decomposition. This colossal Empire in the East is ripe for dissolution. And the end of the Jewish domination in Russia will also be the end of Russia as a State. We are chosen by Destiny to be the witnesses of a catastrophe which will afford the strongest confirmation of the nationalist theory of race.”

Page 533 in Mein Kampf

And then there were Hitler and Germany’s actions during WWII.



  1. Pingback: 1940 Field Marshal Ceremony | VikingLifeBlog
  2. oppositionx · May 15, 2018

    While I certainly understand your point, the world is quite different today than it was during The Fuhrer’s day. And the struggle for the survival of the White Race is quite different as well.

    As you noted in the quotes, Hitler understood that Germany alone had the greatest possibility to fight the jew/bolshevik attack upon the race as it had the most homogeneous population in Europe at the time. This is not so today – all of White Europe is under attack and no homogeneous population exists.

    National Socialism isn’t just good for Germans – it’s good for all people.

    And don’t forget, Adolf Hitler himself stated in 1942: …this is a war which we all wage, this time, not for our German people alone, it is a war for all of Europe, and with it, in the long run, for all of mankind.

    As a National Socialist of German blood, I myself feel comfortable embracing all White Europeans who understand the threat – and outright state of war – that Europe is under today. And I truly believe that Adolf Hitler would do the same – as he did with the elite Waffen SS.

    Liked by 2 people

    • vikinglifeblog · May 16, 2018

      Hi, oppositionx
      You make good points and I will try to address them. I was not trying to compare then with now, I was trying to address how certain people try to rewrite history to suit their Pan-European views.
      As I was trying to point out “the survival of the White Race” doesn’t matter, if we loose North and West Europe (at least not to us). Polish people are the biggest invasion group in Denmark, UK, Iceland and maybe Norway (not sure if they are number 1 or 2). Eastern Europe is a economic burden, too.
      Check links, for information.
      According to Hitler (and me) they are not our race, and they are clearly not our friends (or white, in my opinion).
      None of that would matter, if they stayed in their s-ithole countries and took care of themselves.
      But Eastern Europeans are as anti-white as jews, muslims etc.
      Check, links in post.

      “as it had the most homogeneous population in Europe at the time”

      Many national socialists at the time, was aware of the difference between Germans from North and South. So I would argue that Denmark, Sweden, Norway and maybe Holland was more homogeneous, but that is not important. Germany was a homogeneous population by todays standard, with only a few foreign elements (jews, gypsies, slavs, etc.).

      “And don’t forget, Adolf Hitler himself stated in 1942: …this is a war which we all wage, this time, not for our German people alone, it is a war for all of Europe, and with it, in the long run, for all of mankind.”

      Yes, I accept that. As I wrote: “And then there were Hitler and Germany’s actions during WWII.”
      Germany treated Denmark a lot better than any other country, this was for a number of reasons.
      Denmark was the model, for how life would be for Germanic people if Germany won. Non-Germanic people had another future, if any future at all.

      “As a National Socialist of German blood, I myself feel comfortable embracing all White Europeans who understand the threat – and outright state of war – that Europe is under today. And I truly believe that Adolf Hitler would do the same – as he did with the elite Waffen SS.”

      That is good, but no. Eastern Europe is part of that threat, there is no return from demographic genocide.
      You can not have a Denmark, if the country is full of non-Danes.
      Judging from Hitlers writing and actions, I dont see any reasons to believe he would be any different today. But that is just guesswork, we will never know. That is why I say, lets not corrupting his legacy.

      I am sorry. I wanted to address Waffen SS in the post and how it became a “Pan-European army”, because of pragmatic reasons and not by design. This was very clear in the beginning around 1941.
      Later SS (and Wehrmacht) needed soldiers and started to lower the standard, they never changed their views.
      But the post got so long and I was getting tired. 🙂

      I wrote: “Be a National Socialist or not, but stop corrupting Hitler’s legacy.”
      My point is, that people who dont share Hitler & Co. views on their key points like Germany for Germans, Germanic people #1, jews, gypsies, slavs, etc. should make their own brand of “nationalism” or “socialism” and not mis-use Hitler and national socialism.
      They seems to have more in common with Kalergi than Hitler, so I would suggest “Pan-European Nationalism”

      I dont claim, that there are any simple explanations to complex matters. But, there are some conclusions to be made. Hitler & Co. was for Germany and Germanic people and they identified Germanic people and non-Germanic people and acted accordingly.


      • vikinglifeblog · May 16, 2018

        I wrote:
        “That is good, but no. Eastern Europe is part of that threat, there is no return from demographic genocide.
        You can not have a Denmark, if the country is full of non-Danes.”

        I too, am comfortable embracing all “White Europeans” who understand the threat – and outright state of war – that Europe is under today.
        As long as they leave our countries to our people.


      • oppositionx · May 16, 2018

        vikinglifeblog, I think that your thinking on things is more pervasive than you might believe and it is pretty much the essence of why and how the people of European descent are fading from the world stage – and will continue to do so.

        Where you and I agree is that Hitler & Co. was for Germany and Germanic people and they identified Germanic people and non-Germanic people and acted accordingly.

        Where you and I don’t agree is in the thought that Adolf Hitler’s wisdom can only be limited to Germans alone – and if that wisdom is seen as relevant for all European people this is somehow ‘corrupting Hitler’s legacy’. That is a very shallow understanding of Adolf Hitler’s true legacy.

        When one reads Mein Kampf, for example, the universal nature of his points shout out – his observations regarding Europe and its history are lessons for all Europeans of whichever branch.

        But what I’m trying to stress is really moot anyway. No one really cares. There is so much division and lack of cohesion inside as well as outside every nation and people of the West. And while the evil enemy of all European people sits comfortably by as we tear at each others’ throats, everything once beautiful is dying.

        Nothing will change this age of decline – when once I believed otherwise, I no longer do. Not enough people have learned from the lessons of the past. As a matter of fact, people can’t even understand or see what those real lesson were.

        Liked by 1 person

    • vikinglifeblog · May 16, 2018

      Hi, oppositionx
      I am not sure, that I understand the beginning.

      “Where you and I don’t agree is in the thought that Adolf Hitler’s wisdom can only be limited to Germans alone – and if that wisdom is seen as relevant for all European people this is somehow ‘corrupting Hitler’s legacy’. That is a very shallow understanding of Adolf Hitler’s true legacy.”

      No, I do believe that Adolf Hitler’s wisdom can be used by the whole planet. No problem.
      But it was never his wisdom to have Eastern Europeans leeching off white people and invading their homelands. There most be a limited to how far someone can stretch his views and still call it his views.
      I would say the same, if a “national socialist” was defending the jewish enemy and their actions. As I see them do, with Eastern Europeans.
      I am not German, but I do believe that Adolf Hitler’s views were clearly aimed at Germanic people.

      “When one reads Mein Kampf, for example, the universal nature of his points shout out – his observations regarding Europe and its history are lessons for all Europeans of whichever branch.”

      I guess, that you are right about that.

      “But what I’m trying to stress is really moot anyway. No one really cares. There is so much division and lack of cohesion inside as well as outside every nation and people of the West. And while the evil enemy of all European people sits comfortably by as we tear at each others’ throats, everything once beautiful is dying.”

      Yes, very few care.
      I have been accused of causing division and being personal attacked many times on internet, because I point out that Eastern Europe is our Mexico. It is not real white nationalists who cause division, it is the invaders and their allies. That is also why I made these posts, to enlighten people.
      There is nothing wrong with expecting a certain level of ethic and moral standard from white people.
      I would ask the defenders of Eastern Europe “Is it OK to behave jewish, if you are not jewish?”

      “Nothing will change this age of decline – when once I believed otherwise, I no longer do. Not enough people have learned from the lessons of the past. As a matter of fact, people can’t even understand or see what those real lesson were.”

      The same goes for me. I guess, it is a general problem with humans.
      All we can do is try to limit the damage of an unavoidable crash, of some sort (SHTF/RW).
      We should of cause also think of ourselves and our families, and how to deal with the future.


  3. Pingback: There is no return from demographic genocide! | VikingLifeBlog
  4. Pingback: About National Socialism, Pan-European Nationalism, Waffen SS and Hitler Worshiping | VikingLifeBlog – Truth Darts
  5. oppositionx · May 17, 2018

    Just a final thought: If I’m in Germany, and a Pole moves in next door, and a muslim uprising happens in the street, and the Pole joins me defense of our space, I will gladly fight with that Pole side-by-side as a Kindred spirit.

    Liked by 2 people

  6. tonytran2015 · May 18, 2018

    “History” has been written by the winners. It takes a long time and many courageous people to rewrite the imposed history (risking the Denial charges).

    Don’t you believe that the influence of the parasites has created conditions for wars as far as in Asia, Africa?

    Liked by 2 people

    • vikinglifeblog · May 18, 2018

      I can easily imagine that, also the effect of decades of “capitalism vs communism” in Asia, Africa and South America. Ruthless people are corrupting everything, everywhere, all the time.

      Liked by 1 person

    • oppositionx · May 18, 2018

      tonytran2015 – you understand the global scope of how and why the world is where it is today. Since the early 20th century a concerted – and mostly successful – program of world domination has been going forward at breakneck speed. It is the ‘masters’ wish that people remain focused on a narrow view of world events – so much the better for its progress to go unnoticed.

      Fortunately, there are those who are piecing it together. Unfortunately, there doesn’t appear to be enough and time is running out.

      It is interesting that the ‘Third Position’ does seem to be rising in former ‘colonized’ parts of the globe – while the peoples of the west argue about who exactly are ‘white’ people while the entire race is literally dying out, the once enslaved peoples are rising up. 100 years from now the world we know today won’t even be recognizable in any way-shape-or-form.

      Liked by 2 people

  7. Pingback: VikingLifeBlog
  8. Pingback: EU Dictatorship | VikingLifeBlog
  9. Pingback: The Ethnic Genetic Interests of Europeans | VikingLifeBlog
  10. Pingback: Travelling bands of criminal foreigners a major headache for Denmark | VikingLifeBlog
  11. Pingback: East Germans are not Eastern Europeans | VikingLifeBlog
  12. Pingback: Patrick Little Discusses Infighting & Subversion Within the Alt-Right Movement | VikingLifeBlog
  13. Pingback: About The Alt-Right | VikingLifeBlog
  14. Pingback: James Gunn, Mike Cernovich, and the Puritan SJWs of the Right | VikingLifeBlog
  15. Pingback: Hitler and the East | VikingLifeBlog
  16. Pingback: The Media is Lying about Chemnitz | Declinist Books Surge in Sales | VikingLifeBlog
  17. Pingback: The Führer`s view on the East | VikingLifeBlog
  18. Pingback: European Tier System | VikingLifeBlog
  19. Pingback: Adolf Hitler on the Importance of Racial Preservation | VikingLifeBlog
  20. Pingback: About Pan-European Nationalism and Waffen SS Worshiping | VikingLifeBlog
  21. Pingback: Hiwi (volunteer) | VikingLifeBlog
  22. Pingback: Everything People Believed about Hitler’s Intentions Toward Britain was a Myth Created by Churchill | VikingLifeBlog
  23. Pingback: Christian Peder Kryssing | VikingLifeBlog
  24. Pingback: About Germany’s Non-White Troops | VikingLifeBlog
  25. Pingback: Generalplan Ost | VikingLifeBlog
  26. Pingback: Pan-European nationalism vs Ethnostate nationalism | VikingLifeBlog
  27. Pingback: Delusions of grandeur or just fake | VikingLifeBlog
  28. Pingback: About NS-memes | VikingLifeBlog
  29. Pingback: Muh Europetards – a case study | VikingLifeBlog
  30. Viking Life Blog · December 5

    Hitler’s Skewed Perspective on the Other Axis Powers of WW2 [Did the German Army Agree?]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: