Elected Dictator

For the leaders of authoritarian state, nothing is better than a “democratic” election to establish their legitimacy.

Cirkel med 12 guldstjerner på en blå baggrund.

dictator is a political leader who possesses absolute power. A dictatorship is a state ruled by one dictator or by a small clique. The word originated as the title of a magistrate in the Roman Republic appointed by the Senate to rule the republic in times of emergency (see Roman dictator and justitium).

Like the term “tyrant” (which was originally a non-pejorative Ancient Greek title), and to a lesser degree “autocrat“, “dictator” came to be used almost exclusively as a non-titular term for oppressive rule. In modern usage the term “dictator” is generally used to describe a leader who holds or abuses an extraordinary amount of personal power. Dictatorships are often characterised by some of the following: suspension of elections and civil liberties; proclamation of a state of emergencyrule by decreerepression of political opponents; not abiding by the rule of law procedures, and cult of personality. Dictatorships are often one-party or dominant-party states.

A wide variety of leaders coming to power in different kinds of regimes, such as military juntasone-party statesdominant-party states, and civilian governments under a personal rule, have been described as dictators. They may hold left or right-wing views, or may be apolitical.

In social choice theory, the notion of a dictator is formally defined as a person who can achieve any feasible social outcome he/she wishes. The formal definition yields an interesting distinction between two different types of dictators.

  • The strong dictator has, for any social goal he/she has in mind (e.g. raise taxes, having someone killed, etc.), a definite way of achieving that goal. This can be seen as having explicit absolute power, like Sulla.
  • The weak dictator has, for any social goal he/she has in mind, and for any political scenario, a course of action that would bring about the desired goal. For the weak dictator, it is usually not enough to “give their orders”, rather he/she has to manipulate the political scene appropriately. This means that the weak dictator might actually be lurking in the shadows, working within a political setup that seems to be non-dictatorial. An example of such a figure is Lorenzo the Magnificent, who controlled Renaissance Florence.

Note that these definitions disregard some alleged dictators who are not interested in the actual achieving of social goals, as much as in propaganda and controlling public opinion. Monarchs and military dictators are also excluded from these definitions, because their rule relies on the consent of other political powers (the nobility or the army).

Dictator – Wikipedia

More and more countries in the world hold elections by universal suffrage to elect their president. But behind this encouraging sign for the spread of democracy, are hidden elections that were democratic in name only. Intimidation of opponents, controlled media power, threatened voters, vote rigging, unique candidate: authoritarian regimes compete inventiveness to ensure election results that comfort their legitimacy.

Top 10 of Best elected dictators – Young Diplomats


  1. vᚻællKᚱᛁᛗvosᛏ · January 23, 2021

    Democracy and individuality works in a society which is high trust, low crime, and homogenous. Whilst in a multicultural or multiracial setting Democracy works to further fragment society whilst spouting universalist talking points to bring various groups together. Democracy is a popularity contest on whoever gets the most votes or likes on social media gets selected. In a small population it works though even then there may be minor disagreements. While a large population is incoherent akin to the crowd who swallow up dissenting voices.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Viking Life Blog · January 23, 2021

      You are absolutely right. In a high trust, low crime, and homogenous society, people would have similar interests and common goals. And I too believe, that it works better when we are closer to the people in power.
      We use to have twice as many municipalities about 15 years ago. People in a small municipality would properly have a more common goal and interests than a big municipality with both “large” cities and country side to please.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. ᛋᛉᚺᛟᚾ · January 24, 2021

    Biden isn’t a dictator not any more than Trump, the mundane population was saying the same thing about Trump since 2016, in reality they’re both puppets “social-managers” one just slightly more redeemable than the other but the slightly better one is now banished.

    I otherwise just call the American President the “puppet-elect”.

    Democracy like Capitalism are not ideal systems but are in fact the systems at play, we should choose to use whatever model which grants reach to dominate affairs for our cause “a tool-set” otherwise one might as well have no voice, no opinion & may as well be non-existent.

    This is why I detest defeatists or those spreading the narrative “to just give up on civilization”.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Viking Life Blog · January 24, 2021

      I agree, on all counts. EU feels like a real dictatorship and Denmark has been moving towards that, for dacades.

      Yeah. I guess, I wouldn’t complaine if it was good people in power.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s