Ethnic Heterogeneity

The relationships between the degree of ethnic heterogeneity of an area and other variables have been examined in scientific studies.

One cause for the problems in areas with high ethnic heterogeneity has been argued to be that when an area is no longer ethnically homogeneous, then ethnic nepotism will cause the different ethnicities to try to promote their own ethnic interests and it becomes difficult to govern the whole area rationally.

Trust, social capital, and “hunkering down”

A well-known study by Robert D. Putnam found that higher ethnic heterogeneity was associated with lower trust between people, lower social capital and a “hunkering down” where people avoid engagement with their local community. This occurs both between different ethnic groups and within ethnic groups. This has been associated with many negative effects, many of which are mentioned in different sections in this article.

A 2015 study in Denmark found that the negative effect of ethnic diversity on trust occurred when there was high ethnic diversity in the immediate surrounding residential area, but not when the ethnic diversity was further away. This was interpreted as supporting that “interethnic exposure” decreases trust.

A 2019 meta-review stated that “this article reviews the existing literature on the relationship between ethnic diversity and social trust through a narrative review and a meta-analysis of 1,001 estimates from 87 studies. The review clarifies the core concepts, highlights pertinent debates, and tests core claims from the literature on the relationship between ethnic diversity and social trust. Several results stand out from the meta-analysis. We find a statistically significant negative relationship between ethnic diversity and social trust across all studies. The relationship is stronger for trust in neighbors, and when studied in more local contexts.

The researchers looked investigated whether “continued immigration and the corresponding growing ethnic diversity” have positive impacts on social unity, cohesion, and togetherness. In short, the study found that “continued immigration and corresponding growing ethnic diversity” exerts the exact opposite effect on society. The results mean that it undermines and degrades social cohesion, unity, and togetherness.

Participation in organizations, volunteer activity, census response rate and voting

An overview of different studies published in 2003 stated that higher ethnic heterogeneity in an area is associated with negative effects regarding many variables, such as participation in organizations, volunteer activity, census response rate, and voting.

Labor unions / trade unions

Various forms of evidence is argued to support that high ethnic heterogeneity is negative for labor unions / trade unions and forms of employer organizing. Some employers may consider this to be positive and have been argued to therefore have aimed to racially mix their employees.


A 2011 study in Canada found that higher ethnic heterogeneity reduced the size of individual donations to private charities.

Life satisfaction

A 2004 study in the UK found that higher ethnic heterogeneity in an area was associated with lower life satisfaction.

A 2016 study in the UK found “that an increase in “diversity” makes existing residents of an area feel unhappier and more socially isolated, while those leaving for more homogenrous areas populated by their own ethic group often get happier.

Depression, psychosis, and suicide

Studies have found that higher ethnic heterogeneity in an area is associated with a higher risk of depression.

A 2012 study in the UK found that the risk of psychosis increased when a person lived in an area with a lower percentage of people from the same ethnicity.

A 2003 study found that higher ethnic heterogeneity in a country was associated with a higher frequency of suicide.


A 2012 study found that higher ethnic heterogeneity was associated with higher rates of cardiovascular disease and cancer for elderly individuals.

A 2016 study found that higher ethnic heterogeneity was associated with poorer health outcomes for 91 studied countries.


A 2010 study found that countries with “moderate” levels of ethnic diversity had the best scores on the “Environmental Performance Index” and that increasing ethnic diversity beyond this was associated worsening environmental performance.

Educational performance

A 2010 study found that higher ethnic diversity in a country was associated with lower results on the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA).

Higher education

A 2017 study found that higher ethnic heterogeneity in US states was associated with less public spending on higher education.


A 2016 study found that higher ethnic diversity was associated with lower innovation.

Economic development

A 2009 review stated that higher ethnic heterogeneity was associated with lower economic development. Possible causes included less support for public goods, increased rent seeking, and lower levels of social capital.

A 2011 study in China found that higher ethnic heterogeneity in Chinese provinces was associated with lower economic growth. A 2013 study in China found decreased quality of export goods in Chinese provinces with higher ethnic heterogeneity. Possible explanations included increased communication difficulties and antagonism between workers.

A 2012 study found that higher ethnic heterogeneity decreased the tourism competitiveness of a country. Possible causes included negative effects on political institutions, the economy and the environment.

A 2017 study found that higher ethnic heterogeneity was associated with increased poverty in studied developing countries.

Income inequality

A 2007 study stated that “One frequently voiced concern is that as populations become more diverse, socioeconomic inequalities within countries will become greater. The present study presents new measures of ethnic, racial and religious diversity for 198 countries and territories. These measures were used as predictors of the Gini index in regression models with other predictors. Ethnic and religious diversity were found to be virtually unrelated to the Gini index. However, a high level of racial diversity independently predicts a high Gini index.

Corruption, informal economy, and tax morale

Higher ethnic heterogeneity in an area has been associated with higher corruption.

A 2007 study found that higher ethnic heterogeneity in a country was associated with a larger “informal economy“.

A 2010 study found that higher ethnic heterogeneity in country was associated with lower tax morale.


A large number of studies have examined if ethnically heterogeneous areas have higher crime rates than ethnically homogeneous areas. The areas that have been studied are often different areas in large cities. Almost all studies have found that higher ethnic heterogeneity is associated with higher crime rates.

Studies have found that higher ethnic heterogeneity in a country is associated with a higher rate of homicide.

Ethnic conflicts

Tatu Vanhanen stated in the book Ethnic Conflicts – Their Biological Roots in Ethnic Nepotism (2012) that differences in ethnic heterogeneity between countries explained 66% of the global variation in ethnic conflicts. The degree of democracy and the degree of economic development explained only small parts.

Vanhanen’s earlier book Ethnic Conflicts Explained by Ethnic Nepotism (1999) examined the countries that partly differed from the general pattern that ethnic heterogeneity is associated with more ethnic conflicts. One such group was harsh authoritarian states, such as Communist countries and oil-rich Arab countries with a large population of foreign guest workers, who could be quickly expelled, if conflicts emerged. However, large ethnic conflicts quickly emerged in ethnically heterogeneous Communist countries once the harsh state control disappeared.

Another group that partially differed consisted of poor countries, where most of the populations were farmers, who had little contact with other ethnic groups. Vanhanen predicted that the degree of ethnic conflicts would increase, if these countries modernized.

Ethnically heterogeneous democratic countries that gave a large degree of autonomy to different ethnic areas, or that explicitly divided the state apparatus between different ethnicities, also had relatively low degree of ethnic conflicts (but still higher than ethnically homogeneous countries). A counter-example was the long civil war in Lebanon, that had occurred despite the state apparatus being explicitly divided between the different ethnicities, but Vanhanen thought this was war was in large parts caused by foreign influences.

Countries that had an unusually high degree of ethnic conflicts included countries where the different groups markedly differed in physical appearance. One example was the conflict between Tutsi and Hutu in Rwanda and Burundi. Another example was countries in the Sahara region that had populations from both Sub-Saharan Africa and North Africa. Vanhanen described the situation in many of these countries as being close to civil war. Civil wars between the northern and southern parts of many of these countries have also occurred, after the book was written. Some countries, such as Sudan and Ethiopia, have been formally divided.

Vanhanen saw no easy solution to the ethnic conflicts, which were argued to be largely caused by genetically caused ethnic nepotism. He recommended that countries with a high degree of ethnic heterogeneity should be divided along ethnic lines whenever possible. This could be an alternative in the future even for countries such as the United States, as ethnic conflicts were predicted to increase due to the demographic changes.

See also the Political spectrum article, in particular the sections “Ethnic homogeneity/heterogeneity” and “Increasing polarization,” on aspects such as increasing political polarization in the United States, argued to be related to the increasing ethnic heterogeneity. Race now outweighs all other demographic divides regarding which party to vote for, with factors such as income not even coming close.


Related image

Denmark: The Cost Of Third World Immigration

Denmark: 10 out of 12 Rapes Committed By Migrants

Every 4. thief comes from abroad

Travelling bands of criminal foreigners a major headache for Denmark

2020 broke record in lowest number of burglaries – Closed borders does work

Yet another way to exploite Danish people!

12,196 foreign EU citizens could last year send Danish child-support money home to their children in their home country, to exactly 18,790 children.

The “best and brightest” Iraqis are not fit for work in Denmark – ‘Tip of the iceberg’ examples from 2009

Nursery children of non-western parents are inferior at speaking Danish, have an inferior mathematical understanding and have inferior social skills than children of Danish parents, the study of 13,000 children in Denmark shows.

Immigrants fails military IQ test

Danish study: Third World children have lower IQ and lower empathy

‘functionel analphabet’

About preferential treatment in Danish gymnasiums [preparatory high schools]

Immigrants, Traffic and Cheating – How Low IQ People Get a Driver License

“Ghetto areas ” have the lowest rents

Hatefacts – Denmark

New scientific metanalysis, measuring results from 1,001 earlier estimates, concludes that ethnic diversity and social trust have a negative relationship.

New Dutch Study Of Cost Of Refugees

NO means NO

Diversity and Social Trust

High trust and low trust societies


This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is 128px-Gay_Pride_Flag.svg.png

The Frankfurt School and Critical Theory – Cultural Marxism

The Four stages of ideological subversion

The long march through the institutions

Rules for Radicals

Divide and Rule

Ruling Class

Controlled Opposition

Psychological Warfare

Psychological Manipulation

False Flag

About Globohomo

Both Environment and Genetic Makeup Influence Behavior


  1. Pingback: Ethnic Heterogeneity — VikingLifeBlog | Vermont Folk Troth
  2. ulysses freire da paz jr · September 8

    The ultimate fighting front against the communist, cultural Marxist plutocracy

    The Anti-Globalist Behavior (

    What National Socialists Mean by “Socialism” (

    Leon Degrelle: How Hitler Consolidated Power in Germany (

    Social Achievements in the Third Reich 1933-1939 (

    Wartime aerial photos of Treblinka shatter the lies of the Jewish death camp

    How the National Socialist State Overcame the Economic Crisis ( without looting or plundering anyone see among many others: ” The great “Jewish” patent theft of the Third Reich”

    On the lie of Germany’s original guilt in the two world wars: “As early as 1899, an international Masonic congress in Paris decided to destroy Germany.” (

    The world media, the bankers and freemasonry convinced the world to save communism – see article + comments (


    The Looting of Defeated Germany (

    Andrea Solario – Salome with the Head of St John the Baptist

    By allowing spurious semantic usurpations, history inexorably expands the scope of human bestiality. (

    The world’s first animal protection law came into being in Hitler’s Germany (

    True communism, as different as presented by the theory and propaganda aimed at deluding the unwary, is the most brutal and exploitative form of capitalism – see here no hurry – article and comments The Corona lies are disintegrating faster and faster (

    The story is guided by the project of God, a project that is always focused on freedom and life.

    The fate of a society always depends on the attitude it takes in the face of this project: either it will have freedom and life, or it will produce slavery and death

    Liked by 1 person

    • ulysses freire da paz jr · September 17

      I am brainwashed daily by watching TV.

      “Someone should expound in detail the remarkable similarities between Freud’s doctrine and the tenets of the Hassidists, a strange sect that flourished in Eastern Europe in the 18th and early 19th centuries – tenets that the erudite and generally sympathetic historian of Kabbalism, Dr. CD Ginsburg, can explain only in terms of “the harmful effects of nervous degeneration.”

      Source (

      “Freud was able to diagnose Western culture as essentially neurotic, although apparently, based on the argument of Moses and monotheism, he held the view that Judaism represents the epitome of mental health and moral and intellectual superiority.”

      Source (


      Karl Kraus, the Austrian Jewish journalist who disagreed with Freud, sarcastically wrote, “Psychoanalysis is the mental illness for which it is supposed to be the cure. But the correct and better formula can be expressed in ten words: “Judaism is the disease that psychoanalysis is supposed to cure.”

      Source Yahoo or Google

      Translated with (free version)

      Liked by 1 person

      • Viking Life Blog · September 17

        Thanks, for the information.
        I can’t say, that I know much about Freud!

        Liked by 1 person

      • ulysses freire da paz jr · September 18

        Truth, for being timeless, exists even before the biblical record noted in Matthew 07:16 – “By their fruits you will know them”

        Liked by 1 person

      • ulysses freire da paz jr · September 18

        Truth, for being timeless, exists even before the biblical record noted in Matthew 07:16 – “By their fruits you will know them”

        Liked by 1 person

  3. ulysses freire da paz jr · September 10


    THE BIBLE, which forms the true basis of the Christian faith, nowhere teaches the amalgamation of races. What it does teach is that God is the author of racial separation and that He originally scattered the races across the face of the earth, assigning to each its own territory. God’s law of reproduction states that “everything should bring forth of its own kind” — #151;Genesis 1:11. In promoting and defending the mixing of races, ministers of religion have placed themselves firmly on the side of the enemies of God. It is the Communists, the Illuminati, the UNO and other assorted anti-God groups who are determined to destroy the God-given and ordained entity of race.

    Of course, all of this is no wonder, for the religious leaders of the people have largely rejected The Bible for the twin errors of Evolution and Modernism—the so-called “Higher Criticism”. This originated with Jews who confessed Christian conversion. Many of them taught in theological seminaries in Germany from where the “Higher Criticism” spread to the rest of the world Arthur Pachkofsky, in his book Israel and Judah wrote: “Since the time of Voltaire, Spinoza, Hegel, Kant, Paine and others, criticism of The Bible had begun. At about the same time a group of German Jewish critics, among them Straus, Hitzig, Kachne, Wellhausen and Ervald arose. They began to question every statement in The Bible and to destroy its authority. This ‘Higher Criticism’ which came out of Germany, not from Germans, but from Jews living in Germany”.

    As a consequence millions are stumbling over their faith while brainwashed and subverted clergymen preach Theology based on Jew-inspired ‘Higher Criticism’ or Judeo-Christianity to near empty pews. All exactly according to plans formulated long ago.


    ON JULY 8TH IN HISTORY 1949: The Prohibition of Mixed Marriages Act, prohibiting marriage or sexual relationships between Europeans and non-Europeans — similar to laws then in force in many American states — is passed in South Africa.”



  4. ulysses freire da paz jr · September 10

    The space is yours – thank you for sharing

    Races are as distinct and specific as organs of the human body – humanity is one body and this truth, being timeless exists even before it was inserted in the bible to give credibility to a series of lies posted there.

    Each body organ has a function just as each race has a mission – some are essential others are vital, i.e. – irreplaceable – they are not interchangeable.

    By their fruits you will know them (

    In any time or place we are here to learn and not to judge, because life is a school and not a court of justice. (

    Liked by 1 person

  5. ulysses freire da paz jr · October 29


    “After visiting these places, you can easily understand how Hitler will emerge from the hatred that now surrounds him as one of the most important personalities of all time.”
    John F. Kennedy.

    Adolf Hitler grew up in a middle-class family, and his family even went through a period of severe starvation in the first years of his life. As a soldier in World War I, he found himself at the head of the German government on January 30, 1933, fulfilling the dream of every poor and bourgeois person who had ever tried to do something greater.

    We all know the Hitler story that the system would have you believe. Hitler has become one of the “worst” people who ever lived and murdered millions of innocent Jews. The same story has been repeated in Hollywood for decades, and it’s safe to say that billions of dollars were spent trying to convince you of this black-and-white good-versus-evil perspective of the Nazi regime. What if it’s not quite accurate?

    After examining the work of others who impartially documented history, as well as those who interviewed people who worked and lived with Hitler, there is strong evidence that what we have been told is extremely inaccurate. A whole new study of Hitler and Nazi Germany during World War II is needed, and a different story is sure to emerge from that study.


    1. Hitler freed himself from international bank cartels.

    When Hitler’s term of office as Federal Chancellor began, the German people had neither work nor money and were starving. A wheelbarrow full of 100 billion mark bills could not buy bread at that time and many Germans lived in huts after countless houses and farms were confiscated by Rothschild / Rockefeller-controlled banks.

    The President of the Reichsbank, Dr. Hjalmar Horace Greeley Schacht, revealed the great secret in his book “The Magic of Money” published in 1967:
    “The dramatic devaluation of the mark began shortly after the Reichsbank was” privatized “or handed over to private investors.”

    In other words, it was not the German government that was responsible for post-war hyperinflation, but the private central bank in Germany and its monopoly on money creation. Germany’s economy collapsed and was devastated by the bankers … that is, until Hitler came.

    After Hitler was elected and refused to play by the Rockefeller-Rothschild rules, one of the first things he did was fix the corrupt and debt-based financial system. By completely thwarting the international banking cartels, the National Socialist government issued its own currency, the Reichsmark, which was debt-free and beyond the control of international financial interests.

    Debt-free financing = freedom

    If the United States nationalized its currency, as Hitler did for Germany, it would sever virtually all ties with international bankers, cease manipulating its government and economy, and living debt-free. Just as Hitler issued a debt-free currency for Germany, Abraham Lincoln, as President, established an interest-free banking system in the United States and was murdered for it. Former US President Andrew Jackson issued an interest-free coin and two shots were fired in the head in one assassination attempt, but the shots missed and he survived. John F. Kennedy spent interest-free money during his presidency, and we all know how he met his untimely death.

    After the establishment of the public banking system in Germany, the Jews of the world responded with a declaration of war on Germany, including a worldwide boycott of German products. Within two years, the German economy flourished with its new stable, inflation-free currency.

    2. Hitler created a prosperous economy with no unemployment.

    After establishing a public banking system, Hitler began his rule building new roads, bridges, dams, canals, port facilities, and much-needed repairs to public and private buildings.

    Everything was done with public money that owed no interest to the international “bankers”. As Hitler put it: “For every frame exhibited, we need the equivalent of the work done on a frame or the goods produced.”

    Then the Nazi government encouraged women to become housewives, and all work to repair and improve the country’s infrastructure and transport created jobs for men. In just two years the problem of unemployment was resolved and Germany was back on its feet.

    It is often claimed that Hitler’s success in revitalizing his nation’s economy was largely due to government spending on rearmament. This is a myth. As British historian AJP Taylor noted:
    Germany’s economic upswing, which ended in 1936, was not based on armament; was mainly caused by generous spending on public works, especially on highways, and that public spending also spurred private spending, as [British economist John Maynard] Keynes had said … while almost everyone else in Europe was expecting a major war “Hitler was the only man who neither expected nor planned it”.

    AJP Taylor, From Sarajevo to Potsdam (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1975), p. 140

    3 – Hitler emphasized respect for women, children and strong family values.

    During the economic difficulties shortly before Hitler’s election, Germany experienced a decline in the birth rate. In 1933, Hitler passed a law that allowed married couples to receive interest-free loans of at least 1,000 Reichsmarks (equivalent to a nine-month salary) for starting a home and starting a family.

    For each child born, the couple were allowed to deduct 250 Reichsmarks from the loan. This pioneering system of the National Socialist government exists in Switzerland today. In the eyes of the National Socialists, women were considered to be the keepers of the tribe, the guardians of future generations and the priestesses of domestic virtue.

    Recognizing that families are the most important unit around which a functioning society is built, Hitler emphasized the principle of maintaining a strong bond between family members. Admired for their great respect for mothers, families under Hitler’s leadership were inspired and strengthened.

    Poor families were helped through financial incentives, and family allowances, marriage loans and child allowances were granted equally to all segments of society. .-ns-1

    4. National Socialist nature and animal protection.

    Under the National Socialist regime, mishandling an animal was considered a heinous crime, and if someone was caught mistreating an animal, they were sent to concentration camps. As someone with great admiration for animals, Hitler showed great concern for Germany’s native animals and passed laws that ensure their safety and well-being.

    In 1934 Hitler passed a law called the Reichsjagdgesetz, which regulated the number of animals that could be killed per year and established suitable “hunting times”. This law has been adopted by most of the Western countries.

    Animal welfare began in primary, secondary and university levels, and the Reich Nature Conservation Act was passed in 1935, which placed several native species on a protected list, including the wolf and the Eurasian lynx. It is likely that this law prevented some of the native species that live in European forests today from becoming extinct.

    The National Socialists were also the first to create environmental protection laws in history. The German Reich Conservation Act of 1935 was enacted, which protects
    “The remaining parts of the landscape in the wild, the preservation of which is in the general interest because of rarity, beauty, specialty or scientific, ethnic, forestry or hunting significance.”

    “[It is] useful to know the laws of nature as it enables us to obey them. To act differently would mean to rise against the sky. “- Adolf Hitler

    5 – Hitler banned animal experiments (vivisection).

    The Third Reich was the first country in the world to prohibit vivisection or any experimentation with live animals. Out of his great concern for animal welfare and appropriate treatment, a complete ban on vivisection was issued in April 1933.

    The Prussian Prime Minister Hermann Göring said:
    “An absolute and permanent ban on vivisection is not only a necessary law to protect animals and show compassion for their pain, but it is also a law for humanity itself…. That is why I announced the immediate ban on vivisection and made the practice in Prussia a criminal offense. The perpetrator is housed in a concentration camp until the sentence is imposed. ”

    This caricature shows laboratory animals giving H. Göring the German greeting in recognition of the prohibition of vivisection.

    6 – Hitler funded research on “free energy” technologies.

    Hitler knew that in order to really escape the bastion of economic manipulation by the international banking cartel, he had to find a way to end Germany’s dependence on oil. An inexhaustible source of energy, not monopolized by the private money cartels, was necessary for true sovereignty, and it was what Hitler was looking for.

    This search led to Germany developing what was called “The Nazi Bell,” which is described by author Joseph P. Farrell as follows:
    “a hyper-dimensional physics device that is being investigated under the auspices of the departments of SS-Entwicklungsstelle-IV, research, development and patent, and the super-secret weapons of SS-General Hans Kammler’s black reflection projects, the Kammler’s staff”. .

    According to Farrell:
    “The summary of the mission of Development Agency IV was to develop free energy and make Germany independent of foreign oil.”

    The National Socialist bell was designed for a threefold purpose, according to Farrell:

    • Energy independence
    • Advanced drive technology
    • A weapon of enormous power

    Joseph P. Farrell, in his book Babylon’s Banksters, points to the evidence that after the war the United States made every effort to rebuild the personnel team that worked on the Nazi bell so that they could develop the technology themselves.

    7. German workers were treated well.

    With the aim of improving the standard of living of all German citizens equally, Adolf Hitler stimulated the spirit of integrity, camaraderie and happiness by funding numerous workers welfare programs, including:

    1. Highly subsidized international travel.
    2. 134,000 theater and concert events for 32 million people (between 1933-1938). 2 million people went on cruise ships and 11 million went on theater tours.
    3. Every citizen got a radio.
    4. A 5-day work week for all citizens.
    5. Free Public Health.
    6. The Hitler government banned trade unions and all workers had to join the trade union of the German Labor Front. Strikes were banned and people who refused to work were imprisoned.
    7. All large factories had to provide rest areas, cafeterias, changing rooms and even playing fields and swimming pools for their workers.

    During the Third Reich, German workers were treated better than ever before or after.

    8 – Industrial production and organized agriculture.

    In contrast to today’s economy, in which production is driven by the pursuit of maximum profit, Hitler initiated a policy of self-sufficiency, the aim of which was to produce only what the Germans need. The aim of the National Socialist government was to produce everything for their country that the German people needed without having to rely on imports in order to satisfy the needs of its citizens.

    In addition to the calculated production of material goods, a new policy was introduced so that the goal of agriculture was to produce what the Germans needed, rather than what was most profitable. The government subsidized the farmers for lost profits, and the farmers received guarantees that whatever was grown would be bought.

    9 – Hitler eliminated crime and improved the health of Germans.

    Adolf Hitler was able to reduce the crime rate in Germany. In his 1976 book The Twelve-Year Reich, author R. Grunberger noted that there was a significant decrease in the rates of murder, robbery, robbery, embezzlement, and petty theft during the Hitler years.

    Many foreigners were impressed by the improved prospects and health of Germans, including Sir Arnold Wilson, a British MP who visited Germany seven times after Hitler came to power.

    “Infant mortality has fallen significantly and is well below that in the UK,” wrote Wilson. “Tuberculosis and other diseases have decreased significantly. Never before have criminal courts had so little to do, and prisons have never had so few inmates. It is a pleasure to watch the physical fitness of the German youth. Even the poorest are better dressed than before, and their happy faces testify to the mental improvement that has occurred in them.

    10 – No citizen will starve or freeze to death.

    A fundamental philosophy of Germany at that time was that all citizens should have the same standard of living. Against this background, National Socialist Germany boasted one of the largest social welfare programs in history with the slogan “Nobody should starve or freeze to death”. Every year, Nazis and high-ranking citizens took to the streets to raise charity for the unfortunate and to create a sense of camaraderie towards those in need.

    They even went so far as to publish the names of those who did not do charity in the newspaper as punishment or as a reminder of their negligence. According to Mark Weber of the Institute for Historical Review

    “Once a public official was prosecuted for not making a donation and his argument that he was doing voluntary work was rejected on the grounds that it was an extreme vision of freedom, neglecting all obligations not prescribed by law and therefore an abuse of freedom”.

    An urn that was used for collections during the “winter campaign”.

    11 – The National Socialist Mission against Tobacco.

    Nazi doctors were the first to write a major scientific article linking smoking to lung cancer. According to this report, smoking was banned in restaurants and public transport. The advertising of smoking and cigarettes was heavily regulated by the Nazis, and the tobacco tax was increased to discourage people from smoking. In one of the strongest and most effective anti-smoking movements in history, numerous German health organizations began to educate the public about the risks of miscarriage in smoking pregnant women.

    While the annual per capita cigarette consumption in America exceeded 3,000 in 1940, it was only 749 in Germany.

    . Hitler banned the sale of cigarettes to women.
    • Hitler banned smoking to anyone under the age of 18.
    • Hitler banned people in uniform from smoking.
    • Hitler banned smoking in public areas.
    • Hitler was the first to put “warning” photos of cancerous lungs on cigarette packets.

    Announcement according to the anti-tobacco campaign.

    12 – The National Socialists created a music-loving culture.

    Hitler recognized the importance of bringing music into the fabric of a culturally rich country and founded the State Music Institute in 1933 after he came to power. Its purpose was to promote the timeless work of composers such as Beethoven, Mozart, Brahms, Wagner and others. The Nazis made sure that every German citizen had a radio.

    The Nazi government encouraged young people to take up music as a profession in order to preserve Germany’s rich old cultural heritage. Jazz, swing and sexually provocative music were discouraged in Germany during the Hitler era.

    Source: & cd = 3 & hl = pt-BR & ct = clnk & gl = br)

    “The only demonstrably recorded and written plan for genocide during World War II was not a German plan to exterminate the Jews, but a Jewish plan to exterminate the Germans”
    ( )

    Freedom is always the fruit of truth
    ( )

    Real communism – as different as theory or propaganda aimed at deceiving the unwary – is the most brutal and exploitative form of capitalism

    NATIONAL SOCIALISM is the social conscience of Socialism without class hatred and outmoded economic dogma. ( )


    Half a century later, few people understand the crisis Germany faced at that time. Today, it’s easy to assume that Germans have always been well-fed and even plump. But the Germans Hitler inherited were virtual skeletons.
    ( )

    History is led by the project of God, a project that is always focused on freedom and life. (

    The fate of a society always depends on the attitude it takes towards this project: either it will have freedom and life, or it will produce slavery and death.

    What is National Socialism? ( )

    Liked by 1 person

  6. ulysses freire da paz jr · November 1

    If there was one physical subject, material issue that I think we should focus on, it is clear that the head of the snake is the financial system


    EUROPE – THE LAST BATTLE – PART 2 THE BAD WAR EUROPE – THE LAST BATTLE – PART 2 THE BAD WAR During the entire WWI Germany wanted peace and had nothing to gain in the conflict, even if Germany was well on its way to winning the war in December 1916, Kaiser Wilhelm offered to negotiate peace with the Entente Powers
    ( )

    EUROPE – THE LAST BATTLE – PART 3 The rise of Adolf Hitler – A man who took this degeneration of Germany very badly, possibly more than anyone else in the world, was Adolf Hitler.
    ( )

    ( )

    The Day The Bankers Got Their War
    ( )

    THE FINAL SOLUTION TO THE EUROPEAN PROBLEM- In our school books we are taught that the evil Germans wanted to genocide all Jews. Ironically, there were no written German plans to exterminate the Jews, but on the other hand, there were many Jewish plans to exterminate the Germans. Jewish racists openly called for genocide against the Germans. This was primarily the reason why the National Socialists saw it as their mission to save the German people. 03:28 In Wirklichkeit ist er das, was Multikulturalismus sein sollte. Die Vermischung von nicht europäischen Bevölkerung mit Europärn in europäischen Nationen mit der Absicht, die Europär aus dder Existenz zu miscchen, es bedeutet die Erlösung für das weiße europäische Volk
    ( )

    ( )

    Warning – some viewers may find the following video disturbing
    ( )

    EUROPE – THE LAST BATTLE – PART 8/1 – The Holocaust is the term used to spread the belief that six million Jews were murdered by the Germans during World War II
    ( )

    EUROPE – THE LAST BATTLE – PART 8/2 Ariel Sharon admitted this in 2001: “We, the Jewish people, control America and Americans know it. 06:04 The Jewish German communist Bruno Baum admitted to being one of the most important manufacturers of propaganda in Auschwitz camps. He said, “I am not exaggerating when I say that the majority of the Auschwitz propaganda was written by us in the camp. We write this propaganda for the world public until our very last day of our presence in Auschwitz
    ( )

    Every record was destroyed or forged, every book rewritten, every picture repainted, every statue and street building renamed, every date changed. And the process continues day by day and minute by minute. The story has stopped. Nothing exists but an endless present where the party is always right “George Orwell, 1984 – You see, I think it’s entirely possible that the 1960s will be the last outbreak of human weeen before it was wiped out, and that this is now the beginning of the rest of the future, and that from now on there will just be all of these robots Who walk around, don’t feel and think nothing.
    ( )

    Jews will be at the center of this. This is a huge change for Europe 1:20 There is a clash of civilizations and we, the Jews, are in the midst of this clash of civilizations
    ( )

    Yes, equality, let’s all be the same, let’s open the gates, let’s give up our nationality for which our ancestors worked so hard! It’s just the concept of equality, a beautiful concept of absolute human equality, that can make this possible. So if you want to fight Islam you have to hit it at the core, and the core is this totalitarian concept where diversity and inclusion are at the fore. It prevails in the hearts of those who believe in a vengeance complex. They believe that all whites are responsible for all past atrocities and oppression, and therefore must give up their nationality as payment for their atrocities! Its charm lies in the simplicity of this worldview. These people spread like an epidemic in our society.
    ( )

    Why Germanic Values Will Save the World )

    If the lie is demonstrably communist, then even the blind can see that the truth is National Socialist

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s